Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academics

Departments

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journalshere

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.

Back to the list
Journal

Journal of Conflict Resolution

close

Citation weight

Tier3
Weight in force
Weightingoff

Weight inputs

Each figure with its percentile among the ranked journals. A is the median, over the academics with a work here, of that academic’s citations to the works this site counts for them - never a Google Scholar profile total. Over every academic of this field, all years, whatever the filters select.

A · academics’ median4,306.0 · 27%
B · citations per work193.9 · 77%
N · works102 · 80%
P · academics51 · 85%
Formula result0.806

From this institution

Under these filters. A work with no citation count is unknown here, never a zero.

Works64
Citations14,156 over 60 of 64 works
Citations per counted work235.9
Weighted citations
Academics21
Departments8
First seen1988

Works placed per year

64 of these 64 works carry a year; an undated work is in no year. Works placed, under these filters.

Departments publishing there 8

DepartmentWorks
Penn Political Science21
Harvard Government12
Yale Political Science12
Columbia Political Science6
Cornell Government6
Princeton Politics5
Brown Political Science3
Dartmouth Government1

A work held by two departments counts once in each, so these add up to more than the works above.

Works placed there 64

YearTitleAcademicsCitations
2006Sensitivity Analysis of Empirical Results on Civil War OnsetNicholas Sambanis2,165
2004What Is A Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition.Nicholas Sambanis1,543
2001Do Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part 1).Nicholas Sambanis1,514
2002How Much War Will We See? Explaining the Prevalence of Civil WarNicholas Sambanis991
2009Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from ChechnyaJason Lyall880
2002Understanding Civil War: A New AgendaNicholas Sambanis539
1997Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations: Elections and Divided Government as Constraints on Trade Liberalization.Helen V. Milner438
2001The Study of Interdependence and Conflict: Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future ResearchEdward D. Mansfield426
2013Contracting on Violence: Authoritarian Repression and Military Intervention in PoliticsMilan Svolik353
2002Capacity, commitment, and compliance: International institutions and territorial disputesBeth Simmons320
2005Rules over Real Estate: Trade, Territorial Conflict, and International Borders as Institutions.Beth Simmons289
2011Three Waves of BITs: The Global Diffusion of Foreign Investment Policy,Edward D. Mansfield258
2005Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International RelationsMichael Horowitz · ROSE McDERMOTT253
1988Foreign Policy and the Rational PublicRobert Y. Shapiro248
2019State Control and the Effects of Foreign Relations on Bilateral TradeChristina L. Davis231
2014Allying to Kill: Terrorist Intergroup Cooperation and the Consequences for LethalityMichael Horowitz222
1998The Proliferation of Preferential Trading ArrangementsEdward D. Mansfield219
2008Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations,Edward D. Mansfield212
2018Tying Hands, Sinking Costs, and Leader Attributes.Joshua David Kertzer189
2001When Does Aerial Bombing Work? Quantitative Empirical Tests, 1917-1999Michael Horowitz187
2012Power-Sharing in Post-Conflict Societies: Implications for Peace and GovernanceMelani Cammett181
2010Targeting Nuclear Programs in War and Peace: A Quantitative Empirical Analysis, 1941-2000Sarah E. Kreps158
2009The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict: Does Experience MatterMichael Horowitz150
2002Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance: International Law and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes.Beth Simmons150
2013Time to Kill: The Impact of Election Timing on Post-Conflict StabilityJack L. Snyder142
2018Mechanisms of Morality: Sources of Public Support for U.S.-Led Humanitarian InterventionSarah E. Kreps136
2018SDM: A New Dataset on Self-Determination Movements with an application to the Reputational Theory of Civil WarNicholas Sambanis134
2011Can Cheap Talk Deter? An Experimental AnalysisDustin Tingley131
2011Rushing to the Polls: The Causes of Premature Post-Conflict ElectionsJack L. Snyder112
2017Borrowing Support for War: The Effect of War Finance on Public Attitudes toward ConflictSarah E. Kreps103
2020Forecasting Civil Wars: Theory and Structure in an Age of “Big Data” and Machine LearningNicholas Sambanis100
1992The Concentration of Capabilities and the Onset of WarEdward D. Mansfield95
2014Introducing Deterrence through Moral Hazard in Alliance ContractsAdam Meirowitz92
2018Studying Leaders and Military Conflict: Conceptual Framework and Research AgendaMichael Horowitz90
2014Poor Man’s Atomic Bomb? Explaining the Relationship Between Weapons of Mass DestructionMichael Horowitz89
2016A Revised Look at Interstate Wars, 1816-2007Michael Horowitz73
2018Sizing up the adversary: Leader attributes and coercion in international conflictMichael Horowitz69
2017Cooperation in Hard Times: Self-restraint of Trade ProtectionChristina L. Davis66
2014Reassessing American Casualty Sensitivity: The Mediating Influence of InequalityDouglas L. Kriner60
1997A Reply to Thompson and TuckerEdward D. Mansfield · Jack L. Snyder54
2024Armies and Influence: Elite Experience and Public Opinion about Foreign PolicyJoshua David Kertzer51
2019Sovereignty Rupture as a Central Concept in Quantitative Measures of Civil WarNicholas Sambanis50
2016Conscription, Inequality, and Partisan Support for WarDouglas L. Kriner47
2017Domestic Signaling of Commitment Credibility: Military Recruitment and Alliance FormationMichael Horowitz43
2023Transatlantic Shakedown: Presidential Shaming and NATO Burden SharingSarah E. Kreps39
1990Theory-Driven Versus Data-Driven Assessment in Crisis: A Survey of International Security ReadersJack L. Snyder38
2022What’s Fair in International Politics? Equity, Equality, and Foreign Policy AttitudesJoshua David Kertzer36
2018Sizing Up the Adversary: Leader Attributes, Credibility, and Reciprocation in International ConflictMichael Horowitz29
2023Is Terrorism Really a Weapon of the Weak? Debunking the Conventional Wisdom.Virginia Page Fortna28
2012MAOA and Aggression: A Gene-environment interaction in two populationsROSE McDERMOTT27
2018Arab Responses to Western Hegemony: Experimental Evidence from EgyptAmaney A. Jamal24
2023Democratic Peace and Covert Military Force: An Experimental Test.Joshua David Kertzer23
2015Modeling ‘Effectiveness’ in International RelationsArthur Spirling15
2021Is Theory Useful for Conflict Prediction? A Response to Beger, Morgan, and WardNicholas Sambanis14
2022Collective Risk and Distributional Equity in Climate Change BargainingDustin Tingley12
2022Climbing the Ladder: Explaining the Vertical Proliferation of Cruise MissilesMichael Horowitz7
2022Commitment to the “National” in Post-Conflict Countries: Public and Private Security in LebanonMelani Cammett6
2008Commentary on the special issueHelen V. Milner2
2025Nationalism, Regime Type, and Trade Agreements,Edward D. Mansfield2
2026Shooting from the Hip: The Counterintuitively Intuitive Nature of Deterrence.Joshua David Kertzer1
1996Simulating International Cooperation under UncertaintyGary King
2002Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 1-170. February 2002 special issue on civil warsNicholas Sambanis
2008Problems and Progress in the Study of International Organizations.Helen V. Milner
2007Decision Making Under Stress: the role of personal responsibility in Israel’s Leaders on the Second day of the Yom Kippur WarROSE McDERMOTT

Citations as counted, before any journal weight: 60 of these 64 works carry a count, and a work with no count is unknown, never a zero.