Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Value Statistic Unit

Journals

Citations · the 20 highest of 476
1 Representations A · 25 works 2,968
2 Medical Entomology and Zoology A · 26 works 2,625
4 Critical Inquiry A* · 32 works 1,154
5 Yale French Studies unranked · 3 works 911
6 New Literary History A · 21 works 768
7 American imago unranked · 9 works 760
8 Comparative Literature unranked · 8 works 725
9 NOVEL A Forum on Fiction unranked · 46 works 631
10 Social Text B · 20 works 624
11 boundary 2 unranked · 42 works 622
12 Modernism/modernity B · 16 works 583
13 differences unranked · 28 works 576
14 Modern fiction studies B · 11 works 569
15 South Atlantic Quarterly B · 20 works 563
16 American Literature unranked · 23 works 546
17 Eighteenth-Century Studies unranked · 9 works 520
18 Choice Reviews Online unranked · 1 works 511
19 Journal of American History unranked · 2 works 436
20 ELH unranked · 33 works 423

32,495 citations over 1,325 of 1,744 works (76% carry a count). 118 of 124 academics have at least one counted work. A work with no citation count is unknown here, never a zero.

Works placed per year

Works published in each year
Value Each point

The 1 journals highest on the list, of 476 these filters select. A publication count is over every selected work; an undated work is in no year.

Mean citations per work

Citations a work in the venue carries
Statistic
Series: value.RepresentationsRepresentations 156.2156.2 over 19 of 250.050.0100.0150.0JournalCitations per counted work

The 1 highest of the 1 journals with a counted work. Each bar is over the works of that journal carrying a count, and says how many of how many; 6 selected works carry no count and are in no bar. Citations as counted, before any journal weight: the weight is what the next chart is testing.

Which departments publish there

Works placed in these journals, by department
Value
Series: value.Columbia EnglishColumbia English 88Penn EnglishPenn English 55Harvard EnglishHarvard English 44Yale EnglishYale English 44Brown EnglishBrown English 22Cornell EnglishCornell English 11Princeton EnglishPrinceton English 1102468DepartmentWorks

Every department with a work in the 1 journals the charts are about. A work by two departments counts once in each.

Weight against citations per work

What each weight band is cited

Nothing to draw under these filters.

Every journal the charts are about weighs the same under the current citation weight, so there is nothing to compare. Set a weight in the Citation weight pane.