Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academics

Departmentshere

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journals

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.
Trackademia
Value Measure

Departments

Citations by mean * log(1 + people)
1 Princeton Politics 9 academics 8,170.3
2 Brown Political Science 3 academics 3,433.9
3 Penn Political Science 4 academics 2,777.9
4 Yale Political Science 8 academics 2,097.5
5 Harvard Government 6 academics 1,636.5
6 Cornell Government 4 academics 1,452.5
7 Columbia Political Science 5 academics 949.6
8 Dartmouth Government 0 academics —

22,797 citations over 276 of 335 works (82% carry a count). 14 of 39 academics have at least one counted work. A work with no citation count is unknown here, never a zero.

Publications over time

Works published in each year
Measure X axis

Dartmouth GovernmentHarvard GovernmentYale Political SciencePrinceton PoliticsColumbia Political ScienceCornell GovernmentPenn Political ScienceBrown Political Science

Every selected work, by the year it was published. An undated work is in no year.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Dartmouth Government 0 — — — 0 —
Princeton Politics 9 1/9 0.1111111111111111% 3/9 0.3333333333333333% 0/9 0.0% 130 114/130 0.8769230769230769%
Yale Political Science 8 2/8 0.25% 4/8 0.5% 2/8 0.25% 71 59/71 0.8309859154929577%
Harvard Government 6 0/6 0.0% 1/6 0.16666666666666666% 0/6 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Columbia Political Science 5 0/5 0.0% 1/5 0.2% 0/5 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Cornell Government 4 0/4 0.0% 2/4 0.5% 0/4 0.0% 28 23/28 0.8214285714285714%
Penn Political Science 4 1/4 0.25% 0/4 0.0% 1/4 0.25% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Brown Political Science 3 0/3 0.0% 1/3 0.3333333333333333% 0/3 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Citations over time

Citations received in each year
Value Measure

Dartmouth GovernmentHarvard GovernmentYale Political SciencePrinceton PoliticsColumbia Political ScienceCornell GovernmentPenn Political ScienceBrown Political Science

Citations received in each year by the works these filters select.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Dartmouth Government 0 — — — 0 —
Princeton Politics 9 1/9 0.1111111111111111% 3/9 0.3333333333333333% 0/9 0.0% 130 114/130 0.8769230769230769%
Yale Political Science 8 2/8 0.25% 4/8 0.5% 2/8 0.25% 71 59/71 0.8309859154929577%
Harvard Government 6 0/6 0.0% 1/6 0.16666666666666666% 0/6 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Columbia Political Science 5 0/5 0.0% 1/5 0.2% 0/5 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Cornell Government 4 0/4 0.0% 2/4 0.5% 0/4 0.0% 28 23/28 0.8214285714285714%
Penn Political Science 4 1/4 0.25% 0/4 0.0% 1/4 0.25% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Brown Political Science 3 0/3 0.0% 1/3 0.3333333333333333% 0/3 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Makeup by tenure track

Academics on and off the tenure track
Series: Other.0246810Harvard Other 66Yale Other 88Princeton Other 99Columbia Other 55Cornell Other 44Penn Other 44Brown Other 33HarvardYalePrincetonColumbiaCornellPennBrownAcademicsDepartment

Every academic the filters keep, by whether their current rank is on the tenure track (docs/definitions.md section 7). A rank in neither group - emeritus, postdoc, or a rank no CV states - is its own segment rather than filed under one of them: an emeritus professor was on the tenure track, and an unknown rank is not a claim about tenure at all.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Dartmouth Government 0 — — — 0 —
Princeton Politics 9 1/9 0.1111111111111111% 3/9 0.3333333333333333% 0/9 0.0% 130 114/130 0.8769230769230769%
Yale Political Science 8 2/8 0.25% 4/8 0.5% 2/8 0.25% 71 59/71 0.8309859154929577%
Harvard Government 6 0/6 0.0% 1/6 0.16666666666666666% 0/6 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Columbia Political Science 5 0/5 0.0% 1/5 0.2% 0/5 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Cornell Government 4 0/4 0.0% 2/4 0.5% 0/4 0.0% 28 23/28 0.8214285714285714%
Penn Political Science 4 1/4 0.25% 0/4 0.0% 1/4 0.25% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Brown Political Science 3 0/3 0.0% 1/3 0.3333333333333333% 0/3 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Output by rank

Citations by mean * log(1 + people) at each rank
Value Measure
Series: Harvard Government, Yale Political Science, Princeton Politics, Columbia Political Science, Cornell Government, Penn Political Science, Brown Political Science.0.0500.01,000.01,500.02,000.02,500.03,000.0Unknown Harvard Government over 6 academics 272.8272.8Unknown Yale Political Science over 7 academics 1,410.51,410.5Unknown Princeton Politics over 9 academics 2,723.42,723.4Unknown Columbia Political Science over 5 academics 189.9189.9Unknown Cornell Government over 4 academics 726.3726.3Unknown Penn Political Science over 3 academics 0.00.0Unknown Brown Political Science over 3 academics 1,144.61,144.6Other Yale Political Science over 1 academics 17.317.3Other Penn Political Science over 1 academics 1,196.41,196.4UnknownOtherCitations by mean * log(1 + people)Rank

Harvard GovernmentYale Political SciencePrinceton PoliticsColumbia Political ScienceCornell GovernmentPenn Political ScienceBrown Political Science

Each rank read on its own, so a department of thirty and one of sixty are comparable at the same career stage.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Dartmouth Government 0 — — — 0 —
Princeton Politics 9 1/9 0.1111111111111111% 3/9 0.3333333333333333% 0/9 0.0% 130 114/130 0.8769230769230769%
Yale Political Science 8 2/8 0.25% 4/8 0.5% 2/8 0.25% 71 59/71 0.8309859154929577%
Harvard Government 6 0/6 0.0% 1/6 0.16666666666666666% 0/6 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Columbia Political Science 5 0/5 0.0% 1/5 0.2% 0/5 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Cornell Government 4 0/4 0.0% 2/4 0.5% 0/4 0.0% 28 23/28 0.8214285714285714%
Penn Political Science 4 1/4 0.25% 0/4 0.0% 1/4 0.25% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Brown Political Science 3 0/3 0.0% 1/3 0.3333333333333333% 0/3 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Academics ranked against academics

Each department's rank-n academic, citations
Value Ranks
Series: Dartmouth Government, Harvard Government, Yale Political Science, Princeton Politics, Columbia Political Science, Cornell Government, Penn Political Science, Brown Political Science.01000200030004000500060001 Harvard Government Katrina Forrester 8411 Yale Political Science Isabela Mares 42531 Princeton Politics Robert P. George 56811 Columbia Political Science Joshua Foa Dienstag 5301 Cornell Government Christopher Robert Way 15411 Penn Political Science John S. Lapinski 17261 Brown Political Science Juliet Hooker 24772 Harvard Government Eric Beerbohm 02 Yale Political Science Melody Huang 3132 Princeton Politics Paul Frymer 25612 Columbia Political Science Caterina Chiopris 02 Cornell Government Begüm Adalet 2642 Penn Political Science Andrew Thompson 02 Brown Political Science Deva Woodly 03 Harvard Government Hojung Joo 03 Yale Political Science Lucia Rubinelli 1653 Princeton Politics Alan Patten 24033 Columbia Political Science Daniel Luban 03 Cornell Government Alexandra Blackman 03 Penn Political Science John DiIulio 03 Brown Political Science Marion E. Orr 04 Harvard Government Michael Sandel 04 Yale Political Science Dimitrios Halikias 254 Princeton Politics Gary Bass 04 Columbia Political Science Karuna Mantena 04 Cornell Government Kennia Coronado 04 Penn Political Science Marie Gottschalk 05 Harvard Government Shterna S. Friedman 05 Yale Political Science Jamie Hintson 175 Princeton Politics Jacob N. Shapiro 05 Columbia Political Science Mahmood Mamdani 012345CitationsRank

Dartmouth GovernmentHarvard GovernmentYale Political SciencePrinceton PoliticsColumbia Political ScienceCornell GovernmentPenn Political ScienceBrown Political Science

Rank 5 of 9 at the deepest; 4 of 8 departments still have somebody at the last rank drawn. Rank n of one department is not otherwise related to rank n of another - what this compares is the shape of the lists.

What these filters select, per academic not what the graph divided by
Academic Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Alexandra Blackman 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Andrew Thompson 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Caterina Chiopris 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Daniel Luban 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Deva Woodly 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Eric Beerbohm 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Gary Bass 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Giulia Oskian 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Hojung Joo 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Jacob N. Shapiro 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Jan-Werner Müller 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
John DiIulio 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Jordan Rudinsky 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Karuna Mantena 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Kennia Coronado 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Mahmood Mamdani 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Marie Gottschalk 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Marion E. Orr 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Michael Sandel 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Nazmul Sultan 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Rory Truex duplicate-check placeholder 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Shterna S. Friedman 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Steven Smith 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Timothy Colton 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Yunhyae Kim 1 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0/1 0.0% 0 —
Alan Patten 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 37 28/37 0.7567567567567568%
Begüm Adalet 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 13 10/13 0.7692307692307693%
Christopher Robert Way 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 15 13/15 0.8666666666666667%
Dimitrios Halikias 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 9 7/9 0.7777777777777778%
Isabela Mares 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 39 35/39 0.8974358974358975%
Jamie Hintson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 3 2/3 0.6666666666666666%
John S. Lapinski 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Joshua Foa Dienstag 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Juliet Hooker 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
Katrina Forrester 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Lucia Rubinelli 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 12 8/12 0.6666666666666666%
Melody Huang 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 8 7/8 0.875%
Paul Frymer 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 34 27/34 0.7941176470588235%
Robert P. George 1 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 59 59/59 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Years to promotion

From the PhD to each rank
Series: Penn Political Science.0.05.010.015.020.0Associate Penn Political Science median of 1 academics 6.06.0Full or distinguished Penn Political Science median of 1 academics 17.017.0AssociateFull or distinguishedYears since the PhDRank reached

The median years from the PhD year a CV states to the first year it states that rank. An academic whose CV dates neither is in neither figure.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Dartmouth Government 0 — — — 0 —
Princeton Politics 9 1/9 0.1111111111111111% 3/9 0.3333333333333333% 0/9 0.0% 130 114/130 0.8769230769230769%
Yale Political Science 8 2/8 0.25% 4/8 0.5% 2/8 0.25% 71 59/71 0.8309859154929577%
Harvard Government 6 0/6 0.0% 1/6 0.16666666666666666% 0/6 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Columbia Political Science 5 0/5 0.0% 1/5 0.2% 0/5 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Cornell Government 4 0/4 0.0% 2/4 0.5% 0/4 0.0% 28 23/28 0.8214285714285714%
Penn Political Science 4 1/4 0.25% 0/4 0.0% 1/4 0.25% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Brown Political Science 3 0/3 0.0% 1/3 0.3333333333333333% 0/3 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Journals used

Where these departments place work, by works
Value
Series: value.Perspectives on PoliticsPerspectives on Politics 1515American Political Science ReviewAmerican Political Science Review 1111Comparative Political StudiesComparative Political Studies 1010Political TheoryPolitical Theory 1010American Journal of Political ScienceAmerican Journal of Political Science 99The American Journal of JurisprudenceThe American Journal of Jurisprudence 88The Journal of PoliticsThe Journal of Politics 88The Review of PoliticsThe Review of Politics 88History of Political ThoughtHistory of Political Thought 77Studies in American Political DevelopmentStudies in American Political Development 55Contemporary Political TheoryContemporary Political Theory 55PolityPolity 55South Atlantic QuarterlySouth Atlantic Quarterly 44Theory & EventTheory & Event 44London review of booksLondon review of books 44051015JournalWorks

The twelve venues highest on this reading, of 107.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Dartmouth Government 0 — — — 0 —
Princeton Politics 9 1/9 0.1111111111111111% 3/9 0.3333333333333333% 0/9 0.0% 130 114/130 0.8769230769230769%
Yale Political Science 8 2/8 0.25% 4/8 0.5% 2/8 0.25% 71 59/71 0.8309859154929577%
Harvard Government 6 0/6 0.0% 1/6 0.16666666666666666% 0/6 0.0% 22 13/22 0.5909090909090909%
Columbia Political Science 5 0/5 0.0% 1/5 0.2% 0/5 0.0% 27 22/27 0.8148148148148148%
Cornell Government 4 0/4 0.0% 2/4 0.5% 0/4 0.0% 28 23/28 0.8214285714285714%
Penn Political Science 4 1/4 0.25% 0/4 0.0% 1/4 0.25% 23 21/23 0.9130434782608695%
Brown Political Science 3 0/3 0.0% 1/3 0.3333333333333333% 0/3 0.0% 34 24/34 0.7058823529411765%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.