Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academics

Departmentshere

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journals

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.
Trackademia
Value Measure

Departments

Mean citations per academic
1 Yale Chemistry 11 academics 25,750
2 Harvard Chemistry 11 academics 24,873
3 Penn Chemistry 10 academics 14,341
4 Columbia Chemistry 7 academics 13,048
5 Cornell Chemistry 6 academics 12,531
6 Princeton Chemistry 20 academics 11,384
7 Brown Chemistry 17 academics 11,341
8 Dartmouth Chemistry 5 academics 4,057

1,286,555 citations over 8,727 of 11,024 works (79% carry a count). 74 of 87 academics have at least one counted work. A work with no citation count is unknown here, never a zero.

Publications over time

Works published in each year
Measure X axis Each point

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Every selected work, by the year it was published. An undated work is in no year.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 20 20/20 1.0% 8/20 0.4% 20/20 1.0% 1963 1667/1963 0.8492103922567499%
Brown Chemistry 17 17/17 1.0% 11/17 0.6470588235294118% 17/17 1.0% 2040 1482/2040 0.7264705882352941%
Harvard Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1735 827/1735 0.47665706051873197%
Yale Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1664 1578/1664 0.9483173076923077%
Penn Chemistry 10 10/10 1.0% 8/10 0.8% 10/10 1.0% 1992 1760/1992 0.8835341365461847%
Columbia Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 657 582/657 0.8858447488584474%
Cornell Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 5/6 0.8333333333333334% 6/6 1.0% 701 584/701 0.833095577746077%
Dartmouth Chemistry 5 5/5 1.0% 2/5 0.4% 5/5 1.0% 272 247/272 0.9080882352941176%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Citations over time

Citations received in each year
Value Measure Each point

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Citations received in each year, from the academics’ verified Scholar profiles.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 20 20/20 1.0% 8/20 0.4% 20/20 1.0% 1963 1667/1963 0.8492103922567499%
Brown Chemistry 17 17/17 1.0% 11/17 0.6470588235294118% 17/17 1.0% 2040 1482/2040 0.7264705882352941%
Harvard Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1735 827/1735 0.47665706051873197%
Yale Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1664 1578/1664 0.9483173076923077%
Penn Chemistry 10 10/10 1.0% 8/10 0.8% 10/10 1.0% 1992 1760/1992 0.8835341365461847%
Columbia Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 657 582/657 0.8858447488584474%
Cornell Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 5/6 0.8333333333333334% 6/6 1.0% 701 584/701 0.833095577746077%
Dartmouth Chemistry 5 5/5 1.0% 2/5 0.4% 5/5 1.0% 272 247/272 0.9080882352941176%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Makeup by tenure track

Academics on and off the tenure track
Series: Tenure track.05101520Brown Tenure track 1717Dartmouth Tenure track 55Columbia Tenure track 77Cornell Tenure track 66Harvard Tenure track 1111Penn Tenure track 1010Princeton Tenure track 2020Yale Tenure track 1111BrownDartmouthColumbiaCornellHarvardPennPrincetonYaleAcademicsDepartment

Every academic the filters keep, by whether their current rank is on the tenure track (docs/definitions.md section 7). A rank in neither group - emeritus, postdoc, or a rank no CV states - is its own segment rather than filed under one of them: an emeritus professor was on the tenure track, and an unknown rank is not a claim about tenure at all.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 20 20/20 1.0% 8/20 0.4% 20/20 1.0% 1963 1667/1963 0.8492103922567499%
Brown Chemistry 17 17/17 1.0% 11/17 0.6470588235294118% 17/17 1.0% 2040 1482/2040 0.7264705882352941%
Harvard Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1735 827/1735 0.47665706051873197%
Yale Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1664 1578/1664 0.9483173076923077%
Penn Chemistry 10 10/10 1.0% 8/10 0.8% 10/10 1.0% 1992 1760/1992 0.8835341365461847%
Columbia Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 657 582/657 0.8858447488584474%
Cornell Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 5/6 0.8333333333333334% 6/6 1.0% 701 584/701 0.833095577746077%
Dartmouth Chemistry 5 5/5 1.0% 2/5 0.4% 5/5 1.0% 272 247/272 0.9080882352941176%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Output by rank

Median citations per academic at each rank
Value Measure
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0.010,000.020,000.030,000.040,000.0Distinguished Brown Chemistry over 6 academics 5,162.0Distinguished Dartmouth Chemistry over 2 academics 6,201.5Distinguished Columbia Chemistry over 2 academics 31,919.0Distinguished Cornell Chemistry over 1 academics 17,601.0Distinguished Harvard Chemistry over 7 academics 11,698.0Distinguished Penn Chemistry over 3 academics 11,117.0Distinguished Princeton Chemistry over 9 academics 11,736.0Distinguished Yale Chemistry over 6 academics 18,956.5Full Brown Chemistry over 6 academics 3,485.0Full Dartmouth Chemistry over 1 academics 2,508.0Full Columbia Chemistry over 3 academics 2,291.0Full Cornell Chemistry over 3 academics 7,068.0Full Harvard Chemistry over 3 academics 11,648.0Full Penn Chemistry over 4 academics 22,586.5Full Princeton Chemistry over 5 academics 37.0Full Yale Chemistry over 2 academics 8,039.5Associate Cornell Chemistry over 1 academics 5,732.0Associate Harvard Chemistry over 1 academics 18,894.0Associate Penn Chemistry over 1 academics 5,295.0Associate Princeton Chemistry over 1 academics 2,637.0Associate Yale Chemistry over 2 academics 5,456.0Assistant Brown Chemistry over 5 academics 1,278.0Assistant Dartmouth Chemistry over 2 academics 2,688.0Assistant Columbia Chemistry over 2 academics 2,393.0Assistant Cornell Chemistry over 1 academics 34,639.0Assistant Penn Chemistry over 2 academics 1,786.0Assistant Princeton Chemistry over 5 academics 1,651.0Assistant Yale Chemistry over 1 academics 1,036.0DistinguishedFullAssociateAssistantMedian citations per academicRank

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Each rank read on its own, so a department of thirty and one of sixty are comparable at the same career stage.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 20 20/20 1.0% 8/20 0.4% 20/20 1.0% 1963 1667/1963 0.8492103922567499%
Brown Chemistry 17 17/17 1.0% 11/17 0.6470588235294118% 17/17 1.0% 2040 1482/2040 0.7264705882352941%
Harvard Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1735 827/1735 0.47665706051873197%
Yale Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1664 1578/1664 0.9483173076923077%
Penn Chemistry 10 10/10 1.0% 8/10 0.8% 10/10 1.0% 1992 1760/1992 0.8835341365461847%
Columbia Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 657 582/657 0.8858447488584474%
Cornell Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 5/6 0.8333333333333334% 6/6 1.0% 701 584/701 0.833095577746077%
Dartmouth Chemistry 5 5/5 1.0% 2/5 0.4% 5/5 1.0% 272 247/272 0.9080882352941176%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Academics ranked against academics

Each department's rank-n academic, citations
Value Ranks
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0500001000001500002000001 Brown Chemistry Shouheng Sun 919661 Dartmouth Chemistry Ivan Aprahamian 90361 Columbia Chemistry Xiaoyang Zhu 502071 Cornell Chemistry Robert A. DiStasio Jr. 346391 Harvard Chemistry David R. Liu 1020251 Penn Chemistry Abraham Nitzan 406061 Princeton Chemistry Salvatore Torquato 616611 Yale Chemistry William Jorgensen 1595422 Brown Chemistry Lai-Sheng Wang 437282 Dartmouth Chemistry Paul Robustelli 44642 Columbia Chemistry Tomislav Rovis 204192 Cornell Chemistry Barbara A. Baird 176012 Harvard Chemistry Xiaowei Zhuang 789922 Penn Chemistry Dirk Trauner 310332 Princeton Chemistry Tom Muir 404722 Yale Chemistry Jon Ellman 540833 Brown Chemistry Ou Chen 148293 Dartmouth Chemistry F. Jon Kull 33673 Columbia Chemistry Virginia W. Cornish 136313 Cornell Chemistry Kyle M. Lancaster 101483 Harvard Chemistry Jeffrey R. Long 285843 Penn Chemistry Tianquan “Tim” Lian 241933 Princeton Chemistry Sharon Hammes-Schiffer 324033 Yale Chemistry Patrick Holland 236834 Brown Chemistry Paul Williard 79784 Dartmouth Chemistry Jimmy Wu 25084 Columbia Chemistry Diptarka Hait 43214 Cornell Chemistry Tristan Lambert 70684 Harvard Chemistry Jarad Mason 188944 Penn Chemistry Patrick J. Walsh 209804 Princeton Chemistry Paul Chirik 286094 Yale Chemistry Mark Johnson 142305 Brown Chemistry Richard Stratt 59095 Dartmouth Chemistry Wenlin Zhang 9125 Columbia Chemistry Jonathan S. Owen 22915 Cornell Chemistry Phillip Milner 57325 Harvard Chemistry Adam Cohen 150895 Penn Chemistry Jeffrey D. Winkler 111175 Princeton Chemistry Michael Hecht 224245 Yale Chemistry Nilay Hazari 1162412345CitationsRank

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Rank 5 of 20 at the deepest; 8 of 8 departments still have somebody at the last rank drawn. Rank n of one department is not otherwise related to rank n of another - what this compares is the shape of the lists.

What these filters select, per academic not what the graph divided by
Academic Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Eric Jacobsen 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Erin E. Stache 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Gregory Scholes 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Herschel Rabitz 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
John T. Groves 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Jose Roque 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Richard A. Friesner 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Robert J. Cava 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Todd K. Hyster 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Victor Batista 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Virgil Percec 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Martin F. Semmelhack 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 2 0/2 0.0%
Nozomi Ando 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 1 0/1 0.0%
Abraham Nitzan 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 406 394/406 0.9704433497536946%
Adam Cohen 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 124 119/124 0.9596774193548387%
Amit Basu 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 34 32/34 0.9411764705882353%
Andrew B. Bocarsly 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 1 1/1 1.0%
Barbara A. Baird 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
Benjamin McDonald 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 16 14/16 0.875%
Brenda Rubenstein 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 118 71/118 0.6016949152542372%
Christina Woo 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 80 75/80 0.9375%
Christoph Rose-Petruck 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 81 54/81 0.6666666666666666%
David R. Liu 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 324 99/324 0.3055555555555556%
David Spiegel 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 12 10/12 0.8333333333333334%
Diptarka Hait 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 46 45/46 0.9782608695652174%
Dirk Trauner 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 372 367/372 0.9865591397849462%
E. Chui-Ying Yan 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 75 72/75 0.96%
Emily Balskus 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 118 117/118 0.9915254237288136%
Emily Sprague-Klein 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 33 25/33 0.7575757575757576%
Eunsuk Kim 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 85 83/85 0.9764705882352941%
F. Jon Kull 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 40 37/40 0.925%
Ivan Aprahamian 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 104 102/104 0.9807692307692307%
Ivan J. Dmochowski 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 192 131/192 0.6822916666666666%
James G. Anderson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 201 26/201 0.12935323383084577%
Jarad Mason 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 97 79/97 0.8144329896907216%
Jeffrey D. Winkler 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 178 160/178 0.898876404494382%
Jeffrey R. Long 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 421 85/421 0.20190023752969122%
Jerome Robinson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 39 39/39 1.0%
Jimmy Wu 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 48 47/48 0.9791666666666666%
Jon Ellman 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 356 345/356 0.9691011235955056%
Jonathan S. Owen 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 73 7/73 0.0958904109589041%
Joseph Subotnik 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 251 208/251 0.8286852589641435%
Kang-Kuen Ni 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 125 64/125 0.512%
Kyle M. Lancaster 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 119 118/119 0.9915966386554622%
Lai-Sheng Wang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 522 203/522 0.3888888888888889%
Lilia Xie 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 21/22 0.9545454545454546%
Makeda Tekle-Smith 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 13 8/13 0.6153846153846154%
Marissa Weichman 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 50 50/50 1.0%
Mark Johnson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 196 191/196 0.9744897959183674%
Matthew Zimmt 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 83 82/83 0.9879518072289156%
Megan Kizer 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 23 20/23 0.8695652173913043%
Megan L. Matthews 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 50 45/50 0.9%
Michael Hecht 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 125 121/125 0.968%
Monica E. McCallum 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 13 12/13 0.9230769230769231%
Nilay Hazari 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 131 126/131 0.9618320610687023%
Ou Chen 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 155 130/155 0.8387096774193549%
Patrick Holland 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 231 214/231 0.9264069264069265%
Patrick J. Walsh 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 314 300/314 0.9554140127388535%
Paul Chirik 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 207 207/207 1.0%
Paul Robustelli 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 31 31/31 1.0%
Paul Williard 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 238 187/238 0.7857142857142857%
Peter Weber 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 119 92/119 0.773109243697479%
Phillip Milner 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 116 95/116 0.8189655172413793%
Ralph Kleiner 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 41 41/41 1.0%
Richard Stratt 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 117 111/117 0.9487179487179487%
Robert A. DiStasio Jr. 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 159 87/159 0.5471698113207547%
Robert Knowles 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 83 79/83 0.9518072289156626%
Salvatore Torquato 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 493 461/493 0.9350912778904665%
Sarah Delaney 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 46 46/46 1.0%
Seth Herzon 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 65 65/65 1.0%
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 422 222/422 0.5260663507109005%
Shouheng Sun 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 324 300/324 0.9259259259259259%
Stacy Malaker 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 64 60/64 0.9375%
Theodore Betley 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 89 10/89 0.11235955056179775%
Tianquan “Tim” Lian 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 281 264/281 0.9395017793594306%
Timothy Newhouse 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 86 69/86 0.8023255813953488%
Tom Muir 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 236 225/236 0.9533898305084746%
Tomislav Rovis 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 161 159/161 0.9875776397515528%
Tristan Lambert 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 117 95/117 0.811965811965812%
Virginia W. Cornish 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 76 75/76 0.9868421052631579%
Wenlin Zhang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 49 30/49 0.6122448979591837%
William Jorgensen 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 453 431/453 0.9514348785871964%
William M. Jacobs 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 40 40/40 1.0%
Xiaowei Zhuang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 192 189/192 0.984375%
Xiaoyang Zhu 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 291 291/291 1.0%
Yusong Bai 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 49 33/49 0.673469387755102%
Zahra Fakhraai 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 191 92/191 0.4816753926701571%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Years to promotion

From the PhD to each rank
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0.05.010.015.020.0Associate Brown Chemistry median of 12 academics 9.09.0Associate Dartmouth Chemistry median of 3 academics 9.09.0Associate Columbia Chemistry median of 5 academics 8.08.0Associate Cornell Chemistry median of 3 academics 8.08.0Associate Harvard Chemistry median of 11 academics 7.07.0Associate Penn Chemistry median of 8 academics 9.09.0Associate Princeton Chemistry median of 10 academics 7.07.0Associate Yale Chemistry median of 10 academics 7.57.5Full or distinguished Brown Chemistry median of 11 academics 16.016.0Full or distinguished Dartmouth Chemistry median of 3 academics 16.016.0Full or distinguished Columbia Chemistry median of 5 academics 11.011.0Full or distinguished Cornell Chemistry median of 2 academics 12.012.0Full or distinguished Harvard Chemistry median of 10 academics 9.59.5Full or distinguished Penn Chemistry median of 7 academics 12.012.0Full or distinguished Princeton Chemistry median of 12 academics 10.010.0Full or distinguished Yale Chemistry median of 8 academics 10.010.0AssociateFull or distinguishedYears since the PhDRank reached

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

The median years from the PhD year a CV states to the first year it states that rank. An academic whose CV dates neither is in neither figure.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 20 20/20 1.0% 8/20 0.4% 20/20 1.0% 1963 1667/1963 0.8492103922567499%
Brown Chemistry 17 17/17 1.0% 11/17 0.6470588235294118% 17/17 1.0% 2040 1482/2040 0.7264705882352941%
Harvard Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1735 827/1735 0.47665706051873197%
Yale Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1664 1578/1664 0.9483173076923077%
Penn Chemistry 10 10/10 1.0% 8/10 0.8% 10/10 1.0% 1992 1760/1992 0.8835341365461847%
Columbia Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 657 582/657 0.8858447488584474%
Cornell Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 5/6 0.8333333333333334% 6/6 1.0% 701 584/701 0.833095577746077%
Dartmouth Chemistry 5 5/5 1.0% 2/5 0.4% 5/5 1.0% 272 247/272 0.9080882352941176%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Journals used

Where these departments place work, by works
Value
Series: value.Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of the American Chemical Society 1,5281,528The Journal of Chemical PhysicsThe Journal of Chemical Physics 809809Angewandte Chemie International EditionAngewandte Chemie International Edition 344344The Journal of Physical Chemistry AThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A 261261Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 244244Inorganic ChemistryInorganic Chemistry 224224Organic LettersOrganic Letters 223223Chemical ScienceChemical Science 201201ScienceScience 185185The Journal of Organic ChemistryThe Journal of Organic Chemistry 178178The Journal of Physical Chemistry BThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B 172172Nature CommunicationsNature Communications 138138The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 137137Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyBulletin of the American Physical Society 135135OrganometallicsOrganometallics 12712705001,0001,500JournalWorks

The twelve venues highest on this reading, of 781.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 20 20/20 1.0% 8/20 0.4% 20/20 1.0% 1963 1667/1963 0.8492103922567499%
Brown Chemistry 17 17/17 1.0% 11/17 0.6470588235294118% 17/17 1.0% 2040 1482/2040 0.7264705882352941%
Harvard Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1735 827/1735 0.47665706051873197%
Yale Chemistry 11 11/11 1.0% 5/11 0.45454545454545453% 11/11 1.0% 1664 1578/1664 0.9483173076923077%
Penn Chemistry 10 10/10 1.0% 8/10 0.8% 10/10 1.0% 1992 1760/1992 0.8835341365461847%
Columbia Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 657 582/657 0.8858447488584474%
Cornell Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 5/6 0.8333333333333334% 6/6 1.0% 701 584/701 0.833095577746077%
Dartmouth Chemistry 5 5/5 1.0% 2/5 0.4% 5/5 1.0% 272 247/272 0.9080882352941176%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.