Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academics

Departmentshere

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journals

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.
Trackademia
Value Measure

Departments

Mean citations per academic
1 Harvard Chemistry 7 academics 11,047
2 Columbia Chemistry 2 academics 10,207
3 Penn Chemistry 3 academics 3,376
4 Princeton Chemistry 9 academics 3,354
5 Yale Chemistry 6 academics 2,568
6 Brown Chemistry 6 academics 1,982
7 Dartmouth Chemistry 2 academics 1,888
8 Cornell Chemistry 1 academics 441

169,033 citations over 1,370 of 1,980 works (69% carry a count). 28 of 36 academics have at least one counted work. A work with no citation count is unknown here, never a zero.

Publications over time

Works published in each year
Measure X axis Each point

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Every selected work, by the year it was published. An undated work is in no year.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 518 371/518 0.7162162162162162%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 538 235/538 0.4368029739776952%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 307 164/307 0.5342019543973942%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 208 204/208 0.9807692307692307%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 204 193/204 0.946078431372549%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 128 128/128 1.0%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 55 53/55 0.9636363636363636%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Citations over time

Citations received in each year
Value Measure Each point

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Citations received in each year, from the academics’ verified Scholar profiles.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 518 371/518 0.7162162162162162%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 538 235/538 0.4368029739776952%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 307 164/307 0.5342019543973942%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 208 204/208 0.9807692307692307%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 204 193/204 0.946078431372549%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 128 128/128 1.0%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 55 53/55 0.9636363636363636%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Makeup by tenure track

Academics on and off the tenure track
Series: Tenure track.0246810Brown Tenure track 66Dartmouth Tenure track 22Columbia Tenure track 22Cornell Tenure track 11Harvard Tenure track 77Penn Tenure track 33Princeton Tenure track 99Yale Tenure track 66BrownDartmouthColumbiaCornellHarvardPennPrincetonYaleAcademicsDepartment

Every academic the filters keep, by whether their current rank is on the tenure track (docs/definitions.md section 7). A rank in neither group - emeritus, postdoc, or a rank no CV states - is its own segment rather than filed under one of them: an emeritus professor was on the tenure track, and an unknown rank is not a claim about tenure at all.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 518 371/518 0.7162162162162162%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 538 235/538 0.4368029739776952%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 307 164/307 0.5342019543973942%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 208 204/208 0.9807692307692307%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 204 193/204 0.946078431372549%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 128 128/128 1.0%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 55 53/55 0.9636363636363636%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Output by rank

Median citations per academic at each rank
Value Measure
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0.02,000.04,000.06,000.08,000.010,000.012,000.0Distinguished Brown Chemistry over 6 academics 1,166.01,166.0Distinguished Dartmouth Chemistry over 2 academics 1,888.51,888.5Distinguished Columbia Chemistry over 2 academics 10,207.010,207.0Distinguished Cornell Chemistry over 1 academics 441.0441.0Distinguished Harvard Chemistry over 7 academics 5,763.05,763.0Distinguished Penn Chemistry over 3 academics 2,443.02,443.0Distinguished Princeton Chemistry over 9 academics 4,567.04,567.0Distinguished Yale Chemistry over 6 academics 2,112.02,112.0DistinguishedMedian citations per academicRank

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Each rank read on its own, so a department of thirty and one of sixty are comparable at the same career stage.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 518 371/518 0.7162162162162162%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 538 235/538 0.4368029739776952%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 307 164/307 0.5342019543973942%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 208 204/208 0.9807692307692307%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 204 193/204 0.946078431372549%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 128 128/128 1.0%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 55 53/55 0.9636363636363636%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Academics ranked against academics

Each department's rank-n academic, citations
Value Ranks
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.010000200003000040000500001 Brown Chemistry Shouheng Sun 70521 Dartmouth Chemistry Ivan Aprahamian 37571 Columbia Chemistry Xiaoyang Zhu 193571 Cornell Chemistry Barbara A. Baird 4411 Harvard Chemistry David R. Liu 486371 Penn Chemistry Dirk Trauner 76861 Princeton Chemistry Sharon Hammes-Schiffer 82121 Yale Chemistry Patrick Holland 62592 Brown Chemistry Brenda Rubenstein 21092 Dartmouth Chemistry F. Jon Kull 202 Columbia Chemistry Virginia W. Cornish 10572 Harvard Chemistry Xiaowei Zhuang 158522 Penn Chemistry Jeffrey D. Winkler 24432 Princeton Chemistry Tom Muir 68252 Yale Chemistry William Jorgensen 49243 Brown Chemistry Lai-Sheng Wang 19383 Harvard Chemistry Emily Balskus 59373 Penn Chemistry Virgil Percec 03 Princeton Chemistry Paul Chirik 53153 Yale Chemistry Jon Ellman 36414 Brown Chemistry Sarah Delaney 3944 Harvard Chemistry Jeffrey R. Long 57634 Princeton Chemistry Robert Knowles 52644 Yale Chemistry Seth Herzon 5835 Brown Chemistry Peter Weber 3875 Harvard Chemistry Theodore Betley 8145 Princeton Chemistry Salvatore Torquato 45675 Yale Chemistry Mark Johnson 012345CitationsRank

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Rank 5 of 9 at the deepest; 4 of 8 departments still have somebody at the last rank drawn. Rank n of one department is not otherwise related to rank n of another - what this compares is the shape of the lists.

What these filters select, per academic not what the graph divided by
Academic Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Eric Jacobsen 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Gregory Scholes 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Herschel Rabitz 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
John T. Groves 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Mark Johnson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Robert J. Cava 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Victor Batista 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Virgil Percec 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Barbara A. Baird 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
Brenda Rubenstein 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 108 66/108 0.6111111111111112%
David R. Liu 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 177 47/177 0.2655367231638418%
Dirk Trauner 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 161 159/161 0.9875776397515528%
Emily Balskus 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 73 73/73 1.0%
F. Jon Kull 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 1 1/1 1.0%
Ivan Aprahamian 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 54 52/54 0.9629629629629629%
James G. Anderson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 20 11/20 0.55%
Jeffrey D. Winkler 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 43 34/43 0.7906976744186046%
Jeffrey R. Long 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 167 39/167 0.23353293413173654%
Jon Ellman 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 69 68/69 0.9855072463768116%
Lai-Sheng Wang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 90 16/90 0.17777777777777778%
Patrick Holland 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 85 82/85 0.9647058823529412%
Paul Chirik 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 68 68/68 1.0%
Peter Weber 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 39 15/39 0.38461538461538464%
Richard Stratt 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 2 1/2 0.5%
Robert Knowles 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 62 58/62 0.9354838709677419%
Salvatore Torquato 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 115 106/115 0.9217391304347826%
Sarah Delaney 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 20 20/20 1.0%
Seth Herzon 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 11 11/11 1.0%
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 212 82/212 0.3867924528301887%
Shouheng Sun 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 56 54/56 0.9642857142857143%
Theodore Betley 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 43 8/43 0.18604651162790697%
Tom Muir 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 63 59/63 0.9365079365079365%
Virginia W. Cornish 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 13 13/13 1.0%
William Jorgensen 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 43 43/43 1.0%
Xiaowei Zhuang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 58 57/58 0.9827586206896551%
Xiaoyang Zhu 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 115 115/115 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Years to promotion

From the PhD to each rank
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry.0.05.010.015.020.0Associate Brown Chemistry median of 1 academics 9.09.0Full or distinguished Brown Chemistry median of 1 academics 16.016.0Full or distinguished Dartmouth Chemistry median of 1 academics 14.014.0Full or distinguished Harvard Chemistry median of 1 academics 10.010.0Full or distinguished Princeton Chemistry median of 1 academics 9.09.0AssociateFull or distinguishedYears since the PhDRank reached

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPrinceton Chemistry

The median years from the PhD year a CV states to the first year it states that rank. An academic whose CV dates neither is in neither figure.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 518 371/518 0.7162162162162162%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 538 235/538 0.4368029739776952%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 307 164/307 0.5342019543973942%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 208 204/208 0.9807692307692307%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 204 193/204 0.946078431372549%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 128 128/128 1.0%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 55 53/55 0.9636363636363636%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Journals used

Where these departments place work, by works
Value
Series: value.Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of the American Chemical Society 296296Angewandte Chemie International EditionAngewandte Chemie International Edition 7777The Journal of Chemical PhysicsThe Journal of Chemical Physics 6969Nature CommunicationsNature Communications 6666Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 6262Chemical ScienceChemical Science 5858The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 5757NatureNature 4848ScienceScience 4141ACS CatalysisACS Catalysis 3333Nature BiotechnologyNature Biotechnology 3232Inorganic ChemistryInorganic Chemistry 3232Physical review. EPhysical review. E 3131Organic LettersOrganic Letters 2828Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2727050100150200250JournalWorks

The twelve venues highest on this reading, of 291.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 518 371/518 0.7162162162162162%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 538 235/538 0.4368029739776952%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 307 164/307 0.5342019543973942%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 208 204/208 0.9807692307692307%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 204 193/204 0.946078431372549%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 128 128/128 1.0%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 55 53/55 0.9636363636363636%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 22 22/22 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.