Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academics

Departmentshere

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journals

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.
Trackademia
Value Measure

Departments

Mean citations per academic
1 Yale Chemistry 6 academics 42,536
2 Harvard Chemistry 7 academics 32,086
3 Columbia Chemistry 2 academics 31,919
4 Brown Chemistry 6 academics 25,012
5 Princeton Chemistry 9 academics 19,431
6 Cornell Chemistry 1 academics 17,601
7 Penn Chemistry 3 academics 14,050
8 Dartmouth Chemistry 2 academics 6,202

939,594 citations over 4,998 of 6,572 works (76% carry a count). 29 of 36 academics have at least one counted work. A work with no citation count is unknown here, never a zero.

Publications over time

Works published in each year
Measure X axis Each point

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Every selected work, by the year it was published. An undated work is in no year.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 1439 1192/1439 0.828353022932592%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 1344 525/1344 0.390625%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1234 811/1234 0.6572123176661264%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1300 1245/1300 0.9576923076923077%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 550 527/550 0.9581818181818181%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 367 366/367 0.997275204359673%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 144 139/144 0.9652777777777778%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Citations over time

Citations received in each year
Value Measure Each point

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Citations received in each year, from the academics’ verified Scholar profiles.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 1439 1192/1439 0.828353022932592%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 1344 525/1344 0.390625%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1234 811/1234 0.6572123176661264%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1300 1245/1300 0.9576923076923077%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 550 527/550 0.9581818181818181%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 367 366/367 0.997275204359673%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 144 139/144 0.9652777777777778%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Makeup by tenure track

Academics on and off the tenure track
Series: Tenure track.0246810Brown Tenure track 66Dartmouth Tenure track 22Columbia Tenure track 22Cornell Tenure track 11Harvard Tenure track 77Penn Tenure track 33Princeton Tenure track 99Yale Tenure track 66BrownDartmouthColumbiaCornellHarvardPennPrincetonYaleAcademicsDepartment

Every academic the filters keep, by whether their current rank is on the tenure track (docs/definitions.md section 7). A rank in neither group - emeritus, postdoc, or a rank no CV states - is its own segment rather than filed under one of them: an emeritus professor was on the tenure track, and an unknown rank is not a claim about tenure at all.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 1439 1192/1439 0.828353022932592%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 1344 525/1344 0.390625%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1234 811/1234 0.6572123176661264%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1300 1245/1300 0.9576923076923077%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 550 527/550 0.9581818181818181%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 367 366/367 0.997275204359673%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 144 139/144 0.9652777777777778%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Output by rank

Median citations per academic at each rank
Value Measure
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0.010,000.020,000.030,000.040,000.0Distinguished Brown Chemistry over 6 academics 5,162.05,162.0Distinguished Dartmouth Chemistry over 2 academics 6,201.56,201.5Distinguished Columbia Chemistry over 2 academics 31,919.031,919.0Distinguished Cornell Chemistry over 1 academics 17,601.017,601.0Distinguished Harvard Chemistry over 7 academics 11,698.011,698.0Distinguished Penn Chemistry over 3 academics 11,117.011,117.0Distinguished Princeton Chemistry over 9 academics 11,736.011,736.0Distinguished Yale Chemistry over 6 academics 18,956.518,956.5DistinguishedMedian citations per academicRank

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Each rank read on its own, so a department of thirty and one of sixty are comparable at the same career stage.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 1439 1192/1439 0.828353022932592%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 1344 525/1344 0.390625%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1234 811/1234 0.6572123176661264%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1300 1245/1300 0.9576923076923077%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 550 527/550 0.9581818181818181%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 367 366/367 0.997275204359673%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 144 139/144 0.9652777777777778%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Academics ranked against academics

Each department's rank-n academic, citations
Value Ranks
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Cornell Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0500001000001500002000001 Brown Chemistry Shouheng Sun 919661 Dartmouth Chemistry Ivan Aprahamian 90361 Columbia Chemistry Xiaoyang Zhu 502071 Cornell Chemistry Barbara A. Baird 176011 Harvard Chemistry David R. Liu 1020251 Penn Chemistry Dirk Trauner 310331 Princeton Chemistry Salvatore Torquato 616611 Yale Chemistry William Jorgensen 1595422 Brown Chemistry Lai-Sheng Wang 437282 Dartmouth Chemistry F. Jon Kull 33672 Columbia Chemistry Virginia W. Cornish 136312 Harvard Chemistry Xiaowei Zhuang 789922 Penn Chemistry Jeffrey D. Winkler 111172 Princeton Chemistry Tom Muir 404722 Yale Chemistry Jon Ellman 540833 Brown Chemistry Richard Stratt 59093 Harvard Chemistry Jeffrey R. Long 285843 Penn Chemistry Virgil Percec 03 Princeton Chemistry Sharon Hammes-Schiffer 324033 Yale Chemistry Patrick Holland 236834 Brown Chemistry Peter Weber 44154 Harvard Chemistry Emily Balskus 116984 Princeton Chemistry Paul Chirik 286094 Yale Chemistry Mark Johnson 142305 Brown Chemistry Brenda Rubenstein 23605 Harvard Chemistry Theodore Betley 22655 Princeton Chemistry Robert Knowles 117365 Yale Chemistry Seth Herzon 368112345CitationsRank

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryCornell ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

Rank 5 of 9 at the deepest; 4 of 8 departments still have somebody at the last rank drawn. Rank n of one department is not otherwise related to rank n of another - what this compares is the shape of the lists.

What these filters select, per academic not what the graph divided by
Academic Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Eric Jacobsen 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Gregory Scholes 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Herschel Rabitz 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
John T. Groves 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Robert J. Cava 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Victor Batista 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Virgil Percec 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 0 —
Barbara A. Baird 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
Brenda Rubenstein 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 118 71/118 0.6016949152542372%
David R. Liu 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 324 99/324 0.3055555555555556%
Dirk Trauner 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 372 367/372 0.9865591397849462%
Emily Balskus 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 118 117/118 0.9915254237288136%
F. Jon Kull 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 40 37/40 0.925%
Ivan Aprahamian 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 104 102/104 0.9807692307692307%
James G. Anderson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 201 26/201 0.12935323383084577%
Jeffrey D. Winkler 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 178 160/178 0.898876404494382%
Jeffrey R. Long 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 421 85/421 0.20190023752969122%
Jon Ellman 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 356 345/356 0.9691011235955056%
Lai-Sheng Wang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 522 203/522 0.3888888888888889%
Mark Johnson 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 196 191/196 0.9744897959183674%
Patrick Holland 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 231 214/231 0.9264069264069265%
Paul Chirik 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 207 207/207 1.0%
Peter Weber 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 119 92/119 0.773109243697479%
Richard Stratt 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 117 111/117 0.9487179487179487%
Robert Knowles 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 83 79/83 0.9518072289156626%
Salvatore Torquato 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 493 461/493 0.9350912778904665%
Sarah Delaney 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 46 46/46 1.0%
Seth Herzon 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 65 65/65 1.0%
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 422 222/422 0.5260663507109005%
Shouheng Sun 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 324 300/324 0.9259259259259259%
Theodore Betley 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 89 10/89 0.11235955056179775%
Tom Muir 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 236 225/236 0.9533898305084746%
Virginia W. Cornish 1 1/1 1.0% 0/1 0.0% 1/1 1.0% 76 75/76 0.9868421052631579%
William Jorgensen 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 453 431/453 0.9514348785871964%
Xiaowei Zhuang 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 192 189/192 0.984375%
Xiaoyang Zhu 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 291 291/291 1.0%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Years to promotion

From the PhD to each rank
Series: Brown Chemistry, Dartmouth Chemistry, Columbia Chemistry, Harvard Chemistry, Penn Chemistry, Princeton Chemistry, Yale Chemistry.0.05.010.015.0Associate Brown Chemistry median of 6 academics 9.09.0Associate Dartmouth Chemistry median of 2 academics 10.010.0Associate Columbia Chemistry median of 2 academics 8.08.0Associate Harvard Chemistry median of 7 academics 7.07.0Associate Penn Chemistry median of 3 academics 9.09.0Associate Princeton Chemistry median of 6 academics 6.56.5Associate Yale Chemistry median of 6 academics 7.07.0Full or distinguished Brown Chemistry median of 5 academics 12.012.0Full or distinguished Dartmouth Chemistry median of 2 academics 15.015.0Full or distinguished Columbia Chemistry median of 2 academics 12.012.0Full or distinguished Harvard Chemistry median of 7 academics 9.09.0Full or distinguished Penn Chemistry median of 3 academics 11.011.0Full or distinguished Princeton Chemistry median of 8 academics 10.010.0Full or distinguished Yale Chemistry median of 6 academics 10.010.0AssociateFull or distinguishedYears since the PhDRank reached

Brown ChemistryDartmouth ChemistryColumbia ChemistryHarvard ChemistryPenn ChemistryPrinceton ChemistryYale Chemistry

The median years from the PhD year a CV states to the first year it states that rank. An academic whose CV dates neither is in neither figure.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 1439 1192/1439 0.828353022932592%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 1344 525/1344 0.390625%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1234 811/1234 0.6572123176661264%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1300 1245/1300 0.9576923076923077%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 550 527/550 0.9581818181818181%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 367 366/367 0.997275204359673%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 144 139/144 0.9652777777777778%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.

Journals used

Where these departments place work, by works
Value
Series: value.Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of the American Chemical Society 1,0111,011The Journal of Chemical PhysicsThe Journal of Chemical Physics 487487Angewandte Chemie International EditionAngewandte Chemie International Edition 242242The Journal of Physical Chemistry AThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A 197197Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 173173Inorganic ChemistryInorganic Chemistry 148148ScienceScience 127127Organic LettersOrganic Letters 121121The Journal of Organic ChemistryThe Journal of Organic Chemistry 117117Chemical ScienceChemical Science 104104The Journal of Physical Chemistry BThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B 9292Nature CommunicationsNature Communications 8989The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8686NatureNature 8484BiochemistryBiochemistry 828202004006008001,000JournalWorks

The twelve venues highest on this reading, of 570.

What these filters select, per department not what the graph divided by
Department Academics CVScholarOpenAlex Works With a count
Princeton Chemistry 9 9/9 1.0% 5/9 0.5555555555555556% 9/9 1.0% 1439 1192/1439 0.828353022932592%
Harvard Chemistry 7 7/7 1.0% 2/7 0.2857142857142857% 7/7 1.0% 1344 525/1344 0.390625%
Brown Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1234 811/1234 0.6572123176661264%
Yale Chemistry 6 6/6 1.0% 3/6 0.5% 6/6 1.0% 1300 1245/1300 0.9576923076923077%
Penn Chemistry 3 3/3 1.0% 2/3 0.6666666666666666% 3/3 1.0% 550 527/550 0.9581818181818181%
Columbia Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 367 366/367 0.997275204359673%
Dartmouth Chemistry 2 2/2 1.0% 1/2 0.5% 2/2 1.0% 144 139/144 0.9652777777777778%
Cornell Chemistry 1 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 1/1 1.0% 194 193/194 0.9948453608247423%
  • Over the academics these filters select, so a filtered page describes the academics it selected and not the whole department.
  • A row with nothing held draws no mark above: the graph is quiet there because the evidence is missing, not because the work is.
  • What there was to draw from, not what the graph divided by - the graph states its own denominator above.
  • A Scholar profile is attached when at least 3 of the CV titles are found on it, or 30% of them are; one at another institution or under a different name needs 10 titles, and a profile far larger than the CV that holds only a small part of it is refused. Its articles are then checked one by one: what is not a work, or not by this person, is not counted.