Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academicshere

Departments

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journals

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.

Back to the list
Academic

Daryl G. Press

close

Academic

RankFull
As of2025 · CV
DepartmentDartmouth Government
UniversityDartmouth
FieldPolitical Science
Scholarprofile

Totals

Publications64
Citations4,095
h-index22 · Scholar
Citations per year in post157.5
Years in post26 from the CV positions

Coverage

Works with a count49 of 64
Share77%

Positions

Founding Faculty Director2025–
Professor, Department of Government, Dartmout…2022–
Senior Nonresident Scholar, the Atlantic Coun…2022–
Faculty Director2022–2025
Coordinator2022–2024
Senior Nonresident Fellow, The Atlantic Counc…2022–
Co-founder2021–2024
Director2021–2024
Co-founder2018–
Co-Director2018–
Coordinator, Dartmouth College.2018–2021
Member2018–2019
International Affairs Fellow, Council on Fore…2014–2015
Research Associate, Department of Politics, U…2012–2013
Faculty Fellow, Chicago Project on Security a…2010–2015
and 8 more

Top venues 19 venues

The 15 holding the most of these works; 4 more hold at least one.

International Security16
Foreign Affairs13
The New York Times4
Security Studies3
World Affairs2
˜The œAtlantic2
American Political Science Review1
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding1
Cornell University Press eBooks1
Foreign affairs: Latinoamérica1
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament1
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for…1
SSRN Electronic Journal1
Texas National Security Review1
The American Interest1

Collaborators 2 collaborators

Over every shown department of this field, not only the ones the filters select. 13 of these 64 works are held by another academic here; the column adds to more than that, because a work three of them hold is a shared work with each of the other two.

CollaboratorDepartmentShared works
JENNIFER M. LINDDartmouth Government10
Benjamin A. ValentinoDartmouth Government3

Publications per year

Works this academic published in each year, by the year each work appeared; an undated work is in no year, and a work two colleagues wrote counts for each of them. The publication type, works filters decide which works are here at all.

Citations per year

Citations received in each year, from this academic’s verified Scholar profile, which counts every citation to everything they ever wrote: no publication filter reaches this line - not the publication types, not the works switch, not the year window on publication - and no weight either. It is a profile total, so it does not match the works listed below.

Publications 64 works

Every work these filters select, most cited first and the works with no count at the end: a work nobody has a figure for is unknown, never a zero to be ranked among the works that have one, and it prints an em dash. Each figure is that work’s own citations - Scholar’s count where there is one, else OpenAlex’s - and is not weighted.

YearTitleVenuePublication typeCitations
2005Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threatsbook649
2017The New Era of Counterforce: Technological Change and the Future of Nuclear DeterrenceInternational Securityarticle440
2006The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of U.S. PrimacyInternational Securityarticle417
1997Come Home America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of TemptationInternational Securityarticle368
2013Atomic Aversion: Experimental Evidence on Taboos, Traditions, and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons.American Political Science Reviewarticle339
2006The rise of US nuclear primacyForeign Affairsarticle336
2020The Myth of the Nuclear Revolution: Power Politics in the Atomic AgeCornell University Press eBooksbook163
2001The Myth of Air Power in the Persian Gulf War and the Future of WarfareInternational Securityarticle161
2006The Rise of U.S. Nuclear PrimacyForeign Affairsarticle132
2010Protecting the Prize: Oil and U.S. National SecuritySecurity Studiesarticle129
2009The Nukes We Need: Preserving the American DeterrentForeign Affairsarticle114
2018Markets or Mercantilism: How China Secures its Energy SuppliesInternational Securityarticle100
2013Why States Won’t Give Nuclear Weapons to TerroristsInternational Securityarticle95
2004The Credibility of Power: Assessing Threats during the ‘Appeasement’ Crises of the 1930sInternational Securityarticle81
2002The Effects of Wars on Neutral Countries: Why It Doesn't Pay to Preserve the PeaceSecurity Studiesarticle75
2013The New Era of Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Conflictarticle67
1997Lessons From Ground Combat in the Gulf: The Impact of Training and TechnologyInternational Securityarticle42
1999Urban Warfare: Options, Problems, and the Futurearticle36
2020Reality Check: American Power in an Age of ConstraintsForeign Affairsarticle32
2006Nuclear Exchange: Does Washington Really Have (or Want) Nuclear Primacy?Foreign Affairsarticle31
2023The Return of Nuclear Escalation: America’s Adversaries Have Hijacked its Old Deterrence StrategyForeign Affairsarticle24
2009Restraining OrderWorld Affairsarticle21
2007U.S. Nuclear Primacy and the Future of the Chinese Deterrentarticle20
2010Footprints in the SandThe American Interestarticle19
2007The short shadow of US primacyInternational Securityarticle17
2013Enduring Resilience: How Oil Markets Handle DisruptionsSecurity Studiesarticle16
2018Correspondence New Era or New Error? Technology and the Future of Deterrence ReplyInternational Securityarticle15
2025Strategies of Prioritization: American Foreign Policy After PrimacyForeign Affairsarticle14
2021Five Futures for a Troubled Alliancearticle14
2025Access Denied? U.S. Airpower vs. China’s A2/AD in Maritime East AsiaInternational Securityarticle13
2006Time to Offshore Our TroopsThe New York Timesarticle11
2007Superiority Complex: Why America’s Growing Nuclear Supremacy May Make War with China More Likely˜The œAtlanticarticle10
2006A ascensão da supremacia nuclear dos Estados Unidosarticle10
2011Obama’s Nuclear Upgrade: The Case for Modernizing America’s NukesForeign Affairsarticle9
2008All the Oil We NeedThe New York Timesarticle9
2025Lost Seoul? Assessing Pyongyang’s Other DeterrentTexas National Security Reviewarticle8
2022The Deliberate Employment of U.S. Nuclear Weapons: Escalation Triggers on the Korean PeninsulaJournal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmamentarticle8
2013The Next Korean WarForeign Affairsarticle8
2025US-South Korean Nuclear Sharing: A Middle Path to Increase Security on the PeninsulaAsian Journal of Peacebuildingarticle6
2015Preventing Escalation During Conventional WarsNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Center for Contemporary C…article6
2013The Sources of the Sino-American SpiralThe National Interestarticle6
2013Pyongyang’s Nuclear LogicForeign Affairsarticle6
2007Superiority Complex: The coming nuclear arms race˜The œAtlanticarticle6
2006The Short Shadow of U.S. Primacy?International Securityarticle5
2026The Broken Nuclear Umbrella: What Comes After Extended DeterrenceForeign Affairsarticle2
2006Lieber and Press ReplyForeign Affairsarticle2
1997IníernationInternational Securityarticle2
2004A Victory, But Little Is GainedThe New York Timesarticle1
2003Paying to Keep the PeaceSSRN Electronic Journalarticle0
2024核局勢升級應處之道article
2023South Korea’s Nuclear OptionsForeign Affairsarticle
2021Should South Korea Build Its Own Nuclear Bomb?The Washington Postarticle
2020Con los pies en la tierraForeign affairs: Latinoaméricaarticle
2019Debating the New Era of CounterforceInternational Securityarticle
2018The New Era of Nuclear Arsenal Vulnerabilityarticle
2013How to Respond to North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons전략연구article
2009The Strategy of Restraint: Reclaiming Our Strategic DepthWorld Affairsarticle
2007クラシック・セレクション 核の優位を確立したアメリカ--核抑止時代の終わりかarticle
2006フォーリン・アフェアーズ提携論文 核の優位を確立したアメリカ--核抑止時代の終わりか朝日総研リポートarticle
2006Correspondence Jeffrey S. Lantis Tom Sauer James J. Wirtz Keir A. Lieber andInternational Securityarticle
2006核の優位を確立したアメリカ--核抑止時代の終わりかarticle
2003How to Take BaghdadThe New York Timesarticle
2002The Iraq Questionarticle
Would China Go Nuclear? Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States Caitlin Talmadge, George Washington Unive…International Securityarticle