Trackademia

Welcome to Trackademia

The idea behind Trackademia is to build on existing academic databases like Google Scholar and OpenAlex so that you can trust the data and use it for whatever you want. That comes down to two things.

More data, and more ways to use it. We aggregate publication data from every major source into a single dataset and add information pulled from faculty CVs. Then we let you slice it however you want: choose which sources to build from, write your own formulas, weight journals, adjust for department size.

More accurate, and honest about where it isn’t. We focus on a smaller set of schools so we can verify everything carefully. Faculty lists come from department websites rather than being inferred from publication records, so we know who should be in the data before we go looking. When we can’t find data on someone, we record the gap instead of dropping them. Every number comes with a coverage rate you can check against ground truth.

Everything in Trackademia is built from seven units. AI merges duplicate records across sources and tags each publication so these categories hold up:

  • Publication — citation counts, authors, journal, peer review status, and more
  • Publication group — versions of the same work combined into one entity, such as a working paper and the article it became
  • Academic
  • Department
  • University
  • Field
  • Journal

There are two modes. In Database mode you browse the underlying records and filter by any of the seven units. In Analytics mode you get graphs and comparisons, and you switch views to compare two departments, compare one department against the average of the others, or see them all at once. Tabs let you focus on a particular level of the data.

Trackademia

Every graph on this site

Publications

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Works published per year Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations received per year Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citation distribution Bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
  • Citations by age of work Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work
  • Publication type mix Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
  • Top venues Ranked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Academicshere

Departments

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Publications over time Lines over years
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • Calendar year or years since PhD
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Citations over time Lines over years
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations
    • Measure: Total, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
    • In each year or cumulative
  • Makeup by tenure track Stacked bars
  • Output by rank Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic, Formula
  • Academics ranked against academics Grouped bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • How many ranks (opens on 5)
  • Years to promotion Grouped bars
  • Journals used Stacked bars
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications

Journals

Fields

  • Ranking Ranked table
    • Value: Citations, Weighted citations, Publications
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • Departments by field Bars
    • Measure: Total, Mean per work, Median per work, Mean per academic, Median per academic
  • University rollup Ranked bars
  • Coverage by field Ranked bars

Trackademia

Search the whole site

Search a person, a department, a journal or the title of a work. A person’s name brings up their profile, their publications, their department and the journals they publish in.

Back to the list
Academic

Stephen G. Brooks

close

Academic

RankFull
As of2023 · CV
DepartmentDartmouth Government
UniversityDartmouth
FieldPolitical Science
Scholarprofile

Totals

Publications58
Citations7,947
h-index28 · Scholar
Citations per year in post317.9
Years in post25 from the CV positions

Coverage

Works with a count48 of 58
Share83%

Positions

Guest Professor and Osher Fellow in Internati…2023–
Professor of Government, Dartmouth College2017–
Associate Professor of Government, Dartmouth…2007–2016
Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and Interna…2002–2003
Assistant Professor of Government, Dartmouth…2001–2006
Visiting Predoctoral Fellow, Woodrow Wilson S…1998–2000
Research Analyst, Department of National Secu…1991–1994

Top venues 22 venues

The 15 holding the most of these works; 7 more hold at least one.

International Security14
Foreign Affairs9
Foreign affairs: Latinoamérica4
Princeton University Press eBooks4
International Organization3
Cambridge Review of International Affairs2
H-Diplo2
Journal of Conflict Resolution2
Asia policy1
China International Strategy Review1
Cold War History1
Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)1
Foreign affairs en español1
International Relations1
Perspectives on Politics1

Collaborators 6 collaborators

Over every shown department of this field, not only the ones the filters select. 31 of these 58 works are held by another academic here; the column adds to more than that, because a work three of them hold is a shared work with each of the other two.

CollaboratorDepartmentShared works
William C. WohlforthDartmouth Government27
Deborah Jordan BrooksDartmouth Government3
G. John IkenberryPrinceton Politics3
Joshua David KertzerHarvard Government2
Carles BoixPrinceton Politics1
Kathleen E. PowersDartmouth Government1

Publications per year

Works this academic published in each year, by the year each work appeared; an undated work is in no year, and a work two colleagues wrote counts for each of them. The publication type, works filters decide which works are here at all.

Citations per year

Citations received in each year, from this academic’s verified Scholar profile, which counts every citation to everything they ever wrote: no publication filter reaches this line - not the publication types, not the works switch, not the year window on publication - and no weight either. It is a profile total, so it does not match the works listed below.

Publications 58 works

Every work these filters select, most cited first and the works with no count at the end: a work nobody has a figure for is unknown, never a zero to be ranked among the works that have one, and it prints an em dash. Each figure is that work’s own citations - Scholar’s count where there is one, else OpenAlex’s - and is not weighted.

YearTitleVenuePublication typeCitations
2008World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American PrimacyPrinceton University Press eBooksbook1,109
1997Dueling RealismsInternational Organizationarticle770
2002American Primacy in PerspectiveForeign Affairsarticle672
2015The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China's rise and the fate of America's global positionInternational Securityarticle638
2005Hard Times for Soft BalancingInternational Securityarticle632
2012Don’t Come Home, America: The Case against RetrenchmentInternational Securityarticle567
2011Producing SecurityPrinceton University Press eBooksbook526
2016America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Centurybook505
2000Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for IdeasInternational Securityarticle449
2021Illusions of Autonomy: Why Europe Cannot Provide for Its Security if the U.S. Pulls BackInternational Securityarticle238
1999The Globalization of Production and the Changing Benefits of ConquestJournal of Conflict Resolutionarticle186
2005Correspondence: Striking the BalanceInternational Securityarticle185
2023The Myth of Multipolarity: American Power’s Staying PowerForeign Affairsarticle171
2005International Relations Theory and the Case Against the ‘New Unilateralism’Perspectives on Politicsarticle155
2013Lean Forward: In Defense of American EngagementForeign Affairsarticle136
2009Reshaping the World Order: How Washington Should Reform International InstitutionsForeign Affairsarticle132
2016The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United StatesForeign Affairsarticle119
2005Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, & the Changing Calculus of ConflictPrinceton University Press eBooksbook107
2021Do Partisan Types Stop at the Water’s Edge?The Journal of Politicsarticle87
2016America Abroad: Why the sole superpower should not pull back from the worldbook76
2002From Old Thinking to New Thinking in Qualitative ResearchInternational Securityarticle57
2018The Demographic Transition Theory of War: Why Young Societies are Conflict Prone and Old Societies are the Most PeacefulInternational Securityarticle51
2013Economic Actors’ Lobbying Influence on the Prospects for War and PeaceInternational Organizationarticle46
2003A Double-Edged Sword: Globalization and BiosecurityInternational Securityarticle43
2022What’s Fair in International Politics? Equity, Equality, and Foreign Policy AttitudesJournal of Conflict Resolutionarticle36
2014Correspondence: Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand StrategyInternational Securityarticle34
2012Can We Identify a Benevolent Hegemon?Cambridge Review of International Affairsarticle33
2011Assessing the BalanceCambridge Review of International Affairsarticle31
2021Europe Cannot Defend Itself: The Challenge of Pooling Military PowerSurvivalarticle25
2023The Long Unipolar Moment?Foreign Affairsarticle17
2007Clarifying the End of the Cold War DebateCold War Historyarticle17
2016The once and future superpowerForeign Affairsarticle16
2025The Real China Trump Card: The Hawk’s Case Against DecouplingForeign Affairsarticle12
2008Reflections on Producing SecuritySecurity Studiesarticle10
1997Dueling Realisms (Realism in International Relations)International Organizationarticle10
2025Command of Commerce: America’s Enduring Economic Power Advantage Over Chinabook9
2019Power Transitions, Then and Now: Five New Structural Barriers That Will Constrain China’s RiseChina International Strategy Reviewarticle8
2017Distinguishing a Minimalist Role for Grand TheorizingInternational Relationsarticle8
2024The Trade Truce: When Economic Interdependence Does—and Doesn’t—Promote PeaceForeign Affairsarticle7
2006Brooks and Wohlforth ReplyInternational Securityarticle6
2016Correspondence: Debating China’s Rise and the Future of U.S. PowerInternational Securityarticle4
2019William C. WohlforthSciencearticle2
2015The Rise and Fall of Great Powers in the 21st Century: China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global PositionInternational Securityarticle2
2009La reestructuración del orden mundial: Cómo debería Washington reformar las instituciones internacionalesForeign affairs: Latinoaméricaarticle1
2007Introduction to Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the Changing Calculus of ConflictRePEc: Research Papers in Economicsarticle1
1993The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Precipitating Causes and Future ConsequencesDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC)article1
2026Political Economy of SecurityPrinceton University Press eBooksbook0
2018Assessing the Scope of U.S. Security Commitments in AsiaAsia policyarticle0
2025La verdadera jugada ganadora contra China: un argumento contundente contra la desvinculaciónForeign affairs: Latinoaméricaarticle
2024¿ El comercio pacifica?: Cuando la interdependencia económica promueve, o no, la pazForeign affairs: Latinoaméricaarticle
2018Author's ResponseH-Diploarticle
2016La superpotencia presente y futuraForeign affairs en españolarticle
2016Debating China's Rise and the Future of U.S. PowerProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)article
2016La superpotencia presente y futura: China no superará a Estados UnidosForeign affairs: Latinoaméricaarticle
2013Debating American Engagement: The Future of US Grand Strategy ReplyInternational Securityarticle
2009Author's ResponseH-Diploarticle
2008Carr, EH 35 Carteledge, P. 14article
2002FOREIGN AFFAIRS提携 アメリカの覇権という現実を直視せよ--単極構造時代の機会と危機論座article